Detect plagiarised and similar code across trillions of code sources on the web See what's new

Code Intelligence Hub

Expert insights on AI code detection and academic integrity

AI-Generated Code Detection: The New Frontier in Academic Integrity

Featured

AI-Generated Code Detection: The New Frontier in Academic Integrity

As AI coding assistants become ubiquitous, learn how institutions are adapting to detect AI-generated code and maintain educational standards.

Codequiry Editorial Team · Jan 5, 2026
Read More →

Latest Articles

Stay ahead with expert analysis and practical guides

How to Design Assignments That Resist Code Plagiarism General 9 min
Alex Petrov · 5 days ago

How to Design Assignments That Resist Code Plagiarism

Simple changes to assignment design—unique interfaces, randomized test harnesses, and automated similarity checks—drastically reduce code plagiarism. This guide walks through six concrete tactics with real code examples and grading workflows.

Why Some CS Departments Are Moving Beyond Moss for Plagiarism Detection General 8 min
Dr. Sarah Chen · 1 week ago

Why Some CS Departments Are Moving Beyond Moss for Plagiarism Detection

Riverdale State University’s computer science department spent years relying on Moss to catch plagiarised assignments. But as student work grew more sophisticated — combining copied web code, heavy refactoring, and AI-generated fragments — the department realised token-based similarity alone was no longer sufficient. This case study covers how they transitioned to a multi-tool detection pipeline.

How Winnowing Fingerprints Resist Variable Renaming General 8 min
David Kim · 1 month ago

How Winnowing Fingerprints Resist Variable Renaming

Winnowing fingerprinting is a powerful technique for detecting code plagiarism that survives variable renaming, refactoring, and cosmetic changes. This case study examines how the algorithm works, where it succeeds, and where it falls short compared to AST-based approaches.

How Automatic Grading Evolved From Scripts to Integrity Pipelines General 9 min
Alex Petrov · 1 month ago

How Automatic Grading Evolved From Scripts to Integrity Pipelines

A retrospective on automatic grading in computer science education—from shell scripts comparing output strings to modern platforms combining unit tests, static analysis, and code similarity detection. What we gained, what we lost, and why integrity pipelines matter more than ever.

What Code Similarity Metrics Actually Measure in Student Work General 9 min
David Kim · 1 month ago

What Code Similarity Metrics Actually Measure in Student Work

Not all code similarity is plagiarism, and not all plagiarism is caught by string matching. This article breaks down the three major detection techniques—AST comparison, token-based analysis, and algorithmic fingerprinting—and explains what each one actually reveals about student submissions.

Teaching Students to Write Attribution Comments in Group Work General 10 min
David Kim · 1 month ago

Teaching Students to Write Attribution Comments in Group Work

Attribution comments are a simple but powerful tool for teaching code integrity in collaborative programming projects. This article explains how to implement them effectively, what to include, and how they transform group work from a plagiarism minefield into a learning opportunity.

From Paper Traces to Abstract Syntax Trees: Code Similarity Then and Now General 9 min
Rachel Foster · 1 month ago

From Paper Traces to Abstract Syntax Trees: Code Similarity Then and Now

The history of code similarity detection is a story of escalating arms races. What started with professors reading printouts has evolved through Unix diffs, token-based fingerprinting, and into modern abstract syntax tree analysis. This retrospective traces the key technical shifts that shaped how we detect code plagiarism in programming courses today.

Do AST-Based Engines Catch More Refactored Cheating Than Token-Based Ones General 10 min
Dr. Sarah Chen · 1 month ago

Do AST-Based Engines Catch More Refactored Cheating Than Token-Based Ones

A mid-sized university CS department ran a controlled study comparing AST-based and token-based plagiarism detection across student assignments that had been systematically refactored. The results reveal which technique handles control flow restructuring, identifier renaming, and method reordering — and where both fail entirely.

Why More CS Departments Are Adopting Layered Detection General 10 min
Rachel Foster · 1 month ago

Why More CS Departments Are Adopting Layered Detection

Computer science departments are discovering that no single detection method catches every kind of code plagiarism. This article explores the layered detection approach combining structural, web-source, and AI analysis to create a comprehensive academic integrity system.

When Is Peer Similarity Enough in a Plagiarism Checker General 13 min
James Okafor · 1 month ago

When Is Peer Similarity Enough in a Plagiarism Checker

Source code plagiarism detection relies on two fundamentally different reference sets: peer submissions and the open web. This article examines the trade-offs between each approach, when one method catches cheating the other misses, and how to build detection strategies that combine both for maximum coverage.

The Hidden Plagiarism Your Static Analyzer Is Missing General 7 min
David Kim · 2 months ago

The Hidden Plagiarism Your Static Analyzer Is Missing

Static analysis tools scan for bugs and smells, but they are blind to a pervasive form of intellectual property theft. Our analysis of 1,200 codebases reveals that 41% contain code plagiarized directly from Stack Overflow, GitHub gists, and commercial tutorials—code often carrying restrictive licenses. This is a legal and integrity blind spot that traditional scanners cannot see.

The 8 Code Smells That Predict Your Next Plagiarism Case General 3 min
Marcus Rodriguez · 2 months ago

The 8 Code Smells That Predict Your Next Plagiarism Case

Plagiarism detection often starts long before you upload files to a scanner. Experienced educators recognize specific, subtle anomalies in student code—odd stylistic choices, inconsistent skill levels, and bizarre architectural decisions—that scream "this isn't original work." Here are the eight most reliable human-readable indicators that should trigger a deeper, automated investigation.